https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259665 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part, directing the deletion or restriction of specific disallowances. The disallowance related to costume and dress expenses was deleted, while for car insurance, depreciation on car, and motor car expenses, the disallowance was limited to 5%. The addition under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was restricted to Rs. 1,00,000. The disallowance of expenditure on purchasing paintings was deleted, and the adhoc disallowance on various film production expenses was also deleted. The Tribunal maintained consistent reasoning for the assessment year 2009-2010, restricting disallowances on motor car expenses, depreciation, costumes and dresses, and telephone expenses to 5%. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259665 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part, directing the deletion or restriction of specific disallowances. The disallowance related to costume and dress expenses was deleted, while for car insurance, depreciation on car, and motor car expenses, the disallowance was limited to 5%. The addition under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was restricted to Rs. 1,00,000. The disallowance of expenditure on purchasing paintings was deleted, and the adhoc disallowance on various film production expenses was also deleted. The Tribunal maintained consistent reasoning for the assessment year 2009-2010, restricting disallowances on motor car expenses, depreciation, costumes and dresses, and telephone expenses to 5%. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259665