<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259664</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the Income-tax Officer (TDS) for further verification. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of timely submission of Form No. 27C and the retrospective application of the first proviso to section 206C(6A), aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment to avoid double collection of tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 07:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 538 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259664</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter remanded to the Income-tax Officer (TDS) for further verification. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of timely submission of Form No. 27C and the retrospective application of the first proviso to section 206C(6A), aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment to avoid double collection of tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>