<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170127</link>
    <description>An adjudication made without granting personal hearing was held to violate natural justice, and the lower appellate authority was competent to annul the order-in-original and remand the matter for fresh adjudication. The remand left the dispute open for reconsideration on merits, so the Revenue suffered no legal prejudice and had no maintainable grievance against the appellate order. The departmental appeal was therefore rejected, and the cross-objection disposed of. The principle applied was that an order passed in breach of natural justice may be set aside and remitted for de novo decision, and a party cannot challenge an order that is beneficial to it and does not cause legal injury.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 18:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170127</link>
      <description>An adjudication made without granting personal hearing was held to violate natural justice, and the lower appellate authority was competent to annul the order-in-original and remand the matter for fresh adjudication. The remand left the dispute open for reconsideration on merits, so the Revenue suffered no legal prejudice and had no maintainable grievance against the appellate order. The departmental appeal was therefore rejected, and the cross-objection disposed of. The principle applied was that an order passed in breach of natural justice may be set aside and remitted for de novo decision, and a party cannot challenge an order that is beneficial to it and does not cause legal injury.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>