https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170125 Industries discharging untreated or inadequately treated effluents into the river Ganga were required to adopt minimum pollution-control measures before continuing operations. The Court relied on constitutional environmental duties and the Water and Environment protection statutes to address serious river pollution, public health risk, and harm to aquatic life. Financial inability was not treated as a justification for polluting activity. Tanneries with approved primary treatment plants could continue only if those plants were properly maintained, while others were given time to install them or cease business. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 18:41:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170125 Industries discharging untreated or inadequately treated effluents into the river Ganga were required to adopt minimum pollution-control measures before continuing operations. The Court relied on constitutional environmental duties and the Water and Environment protection statutes to address serious river pollution, public health risk, and harm to aquatic life. Financial inability was not treated as a justification for polluting activity. Tanneries with approved primary treatment plants could continue only if those plants were properly maintained, while others were given time to install them or cease business. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170125