https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170119 The Tribunal upheld the duty demands and interest, rejecting all appeals, emphasizing adherence to substantive conditions of exemption notifications and the Committee's role in verifying compliance. The decision highlighted the significance of timely investments and the requirement for actual delivery and installation within specified periods for claiming exemptions under Notification No. 69/2003. The Tribunal affirmed the Committee's jurisdiction to interpret terms and oversee compliance, supporting duty demands under Sections 11A and 11AB of the Central Excise Act for violation of notification conditions. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 17:55:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170119 The Tribunal upheld the duty demands and interest, rejecting all appeals, emphasizing adherence to substantive conditions of exemption notifications and the Committee's role in verifying compliance. The decision highlighted the significance of timely investments and the requirement for actual delivery and installation within specified periods for claiming exemptions under Notification No. 69/2003. The Tribunal affirmed the Committee's jurisdiction to interpret terms and oversee compliance, supporting duty demands under Sections 11A and 11AB of the Central Excise Act for violation of notification conditions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170119