<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 898 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170105</link>
    <description>Fixation of annual production capacity under the compounded levy scheme could not be sustained where the order did not explain the factual basis for the revised capacity or the effective date applied. The Tribunal found the record insufficient to verify how the Commissioner reached the differential fixation, including the effect of changes in installed machinery. Because the appellants&#039; objections required proper factual reconsideration and hearing, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication rather than being finally affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 16:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 898 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170105</link>
      <description>Fixation of annual production capacity under the compounded levy scheme could not be sustained where the order did not explain the factual basis for the revised capacity or the effective date applied. The Tribunal found the record insufficient to verify how the Commissioner reached the differential fixation, including the effect of changes in installed machinery. Because the appellants&#039; objections required proper factual reconsideration and hearing, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication rather than being finally affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>