<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 79 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170103</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the Court upheld the validity of Rule 27 of the Bank of Patiala (Staff) Rules, 1954. The Court also affirmed the authority of the Board of Directors to frame the Staff rules, ruling that the rules were properly constituted and did not violate Articles 311 or 14 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 16:20:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 79 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170103</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the Court upheld the validity of Rule 27 of the Bank of Patiala (Staff) Rules, 1954. The Court also affirmed the authority of the Board of Directors to frame the Staff rules, ruling that the rules were properly constituted and did not violate Articles 311 or 14 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>