https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170082 In a composite land acquisition notification, the three-year limit for a Section 6(1) declaration is computed by excluding any period during which a relevant stay order remained in force under Explanation II. A stay in connected writ petitions may extend the benefit of exclusion where the notification and declaration are common and the order is not confined to specific parties. However, where a later quashing order expressly limits relief to the writ petitioners before the court, non-petitioners cannot automatically rely on it. On that basis, the Section 6(1) declaration was held not barred as against the appellants, and their challenge failed. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170082 In a composite land acquisition notification, the three-year limit for a Section 6(1) declaration is computed by excluding any period during which a relevant stay order remained in force under Explanation II. A stay in connected writ petitions may extend the benefit of exclusion where the notification and declaration are common and the order is not confined to specific parties. However, where a later quashing order expressly limits relief to the writ petitioners before the court, non-petitioners cannot automatically rely on it. On that basis, the Section 6(1) declaration was held not barred as against the appellants, and their challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170082