<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 382 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170080</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Government of Gujarat&#039;s decision to discontinue donor seats in M.P. Shah Medical College, stating that the arrangement allowing donor nominations conflicted with constitutional principles of equality and merit-based admissions. The Court emphasized that the Unnikrishnan judgment applied to both private and government colleges, rejecting arguments of a binding contract between the Government and the donor. The Court clarified that the termination did not require adherence to natural justice principles and dismissed claims of discrimination in filing appeals. The Court allowed the appeals, overturning the Gujarat High Court&#039;s judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 12:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 382 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170080</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Government of Gujarat&#039;s decision to discontinue donor seats in M.P. Shah Medical College, stating that the arrangement allowing donor nominations conflicted with constitutional principles of equality and merit-based admissions. The Court emphasized that the Unnikrishnan judgment applied to both private and government colleges, rejecting arguments of a binding contract between the Government and the donor. The Court clarified that the termination did not require adherence to natural justice principles and dismissed claims of discrimination in filing appeals. The Court allowed the appeals, overturning the Gujarat High Court&#039;s judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>