https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170076 The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision that the Board's cancellation of the examination constituted a penalty imposed in a quasi-judicial capacity without affording the petitioner an opportunity to present her case. The Court emphasized the principles of natural justice and directed the Board to reconsider the matter after allowing the petitioner to explain her position. The Court did not address the Board's power to condone lecture shortages or potential courses of action, leaving it to the Board to decide after providing the petitioner with an opportunity to be heard. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170076 The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision that the Board's cancellation of the examination constituted a penalty imposed in a quasi-judicial capacity without affording the petitioner an opportunity to present her case. The Court emphasized the principles of natural justice and directed the Board to reconsider the matter after allowing the petitioner to explain her position. The Court did not address the Board's power to condone lecture shortages or potential courses of action, leaving it to the Board to decide after providing the petitioner with an opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170076