https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170075 A notice under Section 29 can satisfy natural justice if it clearly warns the borrower that default by the stated date will lead to takeover of the factory premises, so a separate show-cause notice is not necessarily required. The Court also noted that the borrower's representation should ordinarily be considered before the Corporation resorts to the drastic step of taking possession, but fairness depends on the facts and the offer made here was found unreasonable. On that basis, the Section 29 action was not treated as vitiated for want of a separate notice. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 11:02:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170075 A notice under Section 29 can satisfy natural justice if it clearly warns the borrower that default by the stated date will lead to takeover of the factory premises, so a separate show-cause notice is not necessarily required. The Court also noted that the borrower's representation should ordinarily be considered before the Corporation resorts to the drastic step of taking possession, but fairness depends on the facts and the offer made here was found unreasonable. On that basis, the Section 29 action was not treated as vitiated for want of a separate notice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170075