<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 528 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, rejecting the methodology used to estimate clandestine manufacture and clearance based on natural gas consumption. The evidence of undervaluation and clandestine removal from personal ledgers and pen-drives was deemed unreliable without proper corroboration. Denial of cross-examination of witnesses was held to violate Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, leading to the demands and penalties imposed on the appellants being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 528 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, rejecting the methodology used to estimate clandestine manufacture and clearance based on natural gas consumption. The evidence of undervaluation and clandestine removal from personal ledgers and pen-drives was deemed unreliable without proper corroboration. Denial of cross-examination of witnesses was held to violate Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, leading to the demands and penalties imposed on the appellants being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>