https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259651 The Tribunal held that Rule 8 did not apply as the vehicles were not consumed by the appellant but supplied to the Armed Forces. The appellant paid duty as per an exemption notification and did not avail cenvat credit on the chassis. Precedents were cited where Rule 8 was deemed inapplicable in comparable scenarios. As a result, the orders demanding differential duty were overturned, and the appeals were granted in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2015 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259651 The Tribunal held that Rule 8 did not apply as the vehicles were not consumed by the appellant but supplied to the Armed Forces. The appellant paid duty as per an exemption notification and did not avail cenvat credit on the chassis. Precedents were cited where Rule 8 was deemed inapplicable in comparable scenarios. As a result, the orders demanding differential duty were overturned, and the appeals were granted in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259651