<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 520 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259646</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the minimal one-day delay in filing the income tax return for Assessment year 2006-2007 warranted condonation under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act. Emphasizing a justice-oriented approach and citing past precedents, the court found the respondent&#039;s refusal to condone the delay as pedantic and causing undue hardship. The court made the rule absolute in both petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 520 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259646</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the minimal one-day delay in filing the income tax return for Assessment year 2006-2007 warranted condonation under Section 119(2) of the Income Tax Act. Emphasizing a justice-oriented approach and citing past precedents, the court found the respondent&#039;s refusal to condone the delay as pedantic and causing undue hardship. The court made the rule absolute in both petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>