<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 514 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed without evidence of deliberate intention to evade tax. As the assessee&#039;s actions were found to be bona fide and there was no conscious or mala fide furnishing of inaccurate particulars, the penalty order was set aside. The appeal was allowed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 06:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 514 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed without evidence of deliberate intention to evade tax. As the assessee&#039;s actions were found to be bona fide and there was no conscious or mala fide furnishing of inaccurate particulars, the penalty order was set aside. The appeal was allowed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>