<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, agreeing that the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income and failed to provide explanations during assessment, reassessment, or penalty proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty of Rs. 6,67,394/- for alleged concealment of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, agreeing that the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income and failed to provide explanations during assessment, reassessment, or penalty proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty of Rs. 6,67,394/- for alleged concealment of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>