<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 511 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in deleting the penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were allowed, and the relief granted by the CIT(A) was vacated. The penalties imposed on the assessee for the relevant assessment years were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 06:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 511 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in deleting the penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were allowed, and the relief granted by the CIT(A) was vacated. The penalties imposed on the assessee for the relevant assessment years were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>