https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170064 The State Government's revisional power under section 7-F of the Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 had to be exercised consistently with natural justice because permission to sue for eviction under section 3 withdrew a tenant's statutory protection and affected valuable rights. The Act's scheme, including scrutiny under sections 3(2) and 3(3), showed a quasi-judicial process requiring reasons and a fair hearing. The affected tenant was therefore entitled to a reasonable opportunity to be heard before any revisional order was made. An order passed without such hearing was invalid. en-us Mon, 01 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2015 18:38:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170064 The State Government's revisional power under section 7-F of the Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 had to be exercised consistently with natural justice because permission to sue for eviction under section 3 withdrew a tenant's statutory protection and affected valuable rights. The Act's scheme, including scrutiny under sections 3(2) and 3(3), showed a quasi-judicial process requiring reasons and a fair hearing. The affected tenant was therefore entitled to a reasonable opportunity to be heard before any revisional order was made. An order passed without such hearing was invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170064