https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170063 Official consent or authorisation for prosecution does not, by itself, constitute false evidence, fabricated evidence, or use of a false document in a judicial proceeding. Applying the ingredients of Sections 191, 192 and 193 of the Indian Penal Code, the Court found no prima facie material that either official had made a knowingly false statement before the Court. As the record disclosed no basis for action under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, no inquiry or complaint could be directed. The application was also treated as an attempt to reopen issues that had already attained finality, and was held misconceived and untenable. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2015 18:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170063 Official consent or authorisation for prosecution does not, by itself, constitute false evidence, fabricated evidence, or use of a false document in a judicial proceeding. Applying the ingredients of Sections 191, 192 and 193 of the Indian Penal Code, the Court found no prima facie material that either official had made a knowingly false statement before the Court. As the record disclosed no basis for action under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, no inquiry or complaint could be directed. The application was also treated as an attempt to reopen issues that had already attained finality, and was held misconceived and untenable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170063