<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170059</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and expunging adverse remarks against the Vice Chancellor. The Court emphasized the lack of standing of the writ petitioner in moving the High Court in public interest due to the destruction of answer books, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 17:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 345 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170059</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and expunging adverse remarks against the Vice Chancellor. The Court emphasized the lack of standing of the writ petitioner in moving the High Court in public interest due to the destruction of answer books, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>