https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170055 The rules required the competent authority to review the service record in advance and pass a positive order after the prescribed yearly exercise before stopping crossing of the efficiency bar. Because no timely order was made until September 1984, the respondent's record had already been found satisfactory with a recommendation for promotion, and the bar was stopped without the mandated periodic review after the relevant period had effectively passed, the action was treated as arbitrary, unjust and unfair. The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the special leave petition was dismissed. en-us Fri, 10 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2015 16:46:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170055 The rules required the competent authority to review the service record in advance and pass a positive order after the prescribed yearly exercise before stopping crossing of the efficiency bar. Because no timely order was made until September 1984, the respondent's record had already been found satisfactory with a recommendation for promotion, and the bar was stopped without the mandated periodic review after the relevant period had effectively passed, the action was treated as arbitrary, unjust and unfair. The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the special leave petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170055