<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170050</link>
    <description>Adoption procedures were clarified to prioritise child welfare while reducing avoidable delay and misuse. Reasonable payment to scrutinising agencies was approved, with differing treatment for foreign-parent and Indian/Hindu-parent matters. Newspaper publication was kept unpublished under Section 9(4) adoption applications to avoid interference from biological parents. A recognised placement agency was required to have at least one month&#039;s custody before processing guardianship, and inter-State transfers were allowed only with safeguards and approvals. The Court also streamlined declaration of a child legally free for adoption, accepted a relinquishment deed in suitable cases, relaxed joint-guardian and security requirements, increased reimbursable expenses, and permitted home-study reports by the agency for foreign nationals resident in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 14:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=385016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170050</link>
      <description>Adoption procedures were clarified to prioritise child welfare while reducing avoidable delay and misuse. Reasonable payment to scrutinising agencies was approved, with differing treatment for foreign-parent and Indian/Hindu-parent matters. Newspaper publication was kept unpublished under Section 9(4) adoption applications to avoid interference from biological parents. A recognised placement agency was required to have at least one month&#039;s custody before processing guardianship, and inter-State transfers were allowed only with safeguards and approvals. The Court also streamlined declaration of a child legally free for adoption, accepted a relinquishment deed in suitable cases, relaxed joint-guardian and security requirements, increased reimbursable expenses, and permitted home-study reports by the agency for foreign nationals resident in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>