<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1309 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170044</link>
    <description>Interference with an acquittal in a circumstantial evidence case is justified where material incriminating circumstances are ignored and the acquittal is perverse. The record described the deceased&#039;s presence in the respondents&#039; flat, fatal head injuries there, cleaning of the room before medical arrival, and recovery of the weapon at one respondent&#039;s instance, forming a complete chain of circumstances. It also states that a conviction is not vitiated merely because the original charge was different, if no prejudice or failure of justice is shown. On the proved facts, the matter was treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder rather than murder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1309 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170044</link>
      <description>Interference with an acquittal in a circumstantial evidence case is justified where material incriminating circumstances are ignored and the acquittal is perverse. The record described the deceased&#039;s presence in the respondents&#039; flat, fatal head injuries there, cleaning of the room before medical arrival, and recovery of the weapon at one respondent&#039;s instance, forming a complete chain of circumstances. It also states that a conviction is not vitiated merely because the original charge was different, if no prejudice or failure of justice is shown. On the proved facts, the matter was treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder rather than murder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>