https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170036 The Supreme Court held that while the High Court can ensure fairness in decision-making processes, it cannot dictate appointment procedures for the Chairman of the State Public Service Commission. The Court found the High Court's detailed appointment procedure to be beyond its jurisdiction, emphasizing the Governor's prerogative in such appointments. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Punjab and Haryana partially, upholding the quashing of Mr. Dhanda's appointment due to procedural flaws and lack of proper consideration of qualifications. The State Government was directed to establish transparent guidelines for future appointments. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170036 The Supreme Court held that while the High Court can ensure fairness in decision-making processes, it cannot dictate appointment procedures for the Chairman of the State Public Service Commission. The Court found the High Court's detailed appointment procedure to be beyond its jurisdiction, emphasizing the Governor's prerogative in such appointments. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Punjab and Haryana partially, upholding the quashing of Mr. Dhanda's appointment due to procedural flaws and lack of proper consideration of qualifications. The State Government was directed to establish transparent guidelines for future appointments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170036