https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259612 The Tribunal set aside the prohibition order against the Customs Broker, allowing it to resume operations. The judgment favored the appellant, citing lack of evidence linking management to employee actions and absence of emergent reasons for the prohibition. The Tribunal noted no serious charges, alleged revenue loss, or valid grounds for the order, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant due to insufficient justification for punitive measures. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259612 The Tribunal set aside the prohibition order against the Customs Broker, allowing it to resume operations. The judgment favored the appellant, citing lack of evidence linking management to employee actions and absence of emergent reasons for the prohibition. The Tribunal noted no serious charges, alleged revenue loss, or valid grounds for the order, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant due to insufficient justification for punitive measures. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259612