https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259603 The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes. The issues regarding sundry creditors and acceptance of additional evidence were remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication following Rule 46A. The deletion of the addition on house tax for the director's premises was upheld, supporting the CIT(A)'s decision based on business justification. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259603 The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes. The issues regarding sundry creditors and acceptance of additional evidence were remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication following Rule 46A. The deletion of the addition on house tax for the director's premises was upheld, supporting the CIT(A)'s decision based on business justification. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259603