<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify amounts to prevent double taxation. Consistent application of revenue recognition policy and previous favorable judgments were key. Res judicata principle, though not directly applicable, influenced the decision for tax treatment consistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify amounts to prevent double taxation. Consistent application of revenue recognition policy and previous favorable judgments were key. Res judicata principle, though not directly applicable, influenced the decision for tax treatment consistency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>