<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 1,74,318 and Rs. 1,25,000. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of share transactions and set aside the addition related to unexplained credit for further evaluation by the Assessing Officer based on new evidence submitted during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 16:08:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 1,74,318 and Rs. 1,25,000. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of share transactions and set aside the addition related to unexplained credit for further evaluation by the Assessing Officer based on new evidence submitted during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>