<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 459 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside because it disposed of the appeal without examining the full record and the relevant materials placed before it. The High Court held that where material evidence has not been considered, interference is justified and the appeal should be restored for fresh disposal after hearing both sides and considering all materials. The merits were left open, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 16:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 459 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside because it disposed of the appeal without examining the full record and the relevant materials placed before it. The High Court held that where material evidence has not been considered, interference is justified and the appeal should be restored for fresh disposal after hearing both sides and considering all materials. The merits were left open, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>