<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170010</link>
    <description>A temporary government servant&#039;s termination under the Central Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules, 1965 was held to be termination simpliciter where the order merely recorded that the employee was under suspension, without imputing misconduct or casting stigma. The order therefore did not require a disciplinary enquiry and was valid under the temporary service rules. Acquittal in the criminal case did not by itself create a right to reinstatement or render the termination illegal; the competent authority could still decide whether reinstatement was appropriate or whether action under the service rules should be taken. The appellate view on stigma and compensation was rejected, and the writ petition&#039;s dismissal was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 16:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 604 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170010</link>
      <description>A temporary government servant&#039;s termination under the Central Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules, 1965 was held to be termination simpliciter where the order merely recorded that the employee was under suspension, without imputing misconduct or casting stigma. The order therefore did not require a disciplinary enquiry and was valid under the temporary service rules. Acquittal in the criminal case did not by itself create a right to reinstatement or render the termination illegal; the competent authority could still decide whether reinstatement was appropriate or whether action under the service rules should be taken. The appellate view on stigma and compensation was rejected, and the writ petition&#039;s dismissal was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>