<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order u/s 158BC, stating that the notice issuance during an ongoing search was a procedural irregularity. The Tribunal rejected the contention that the assessment order was time-barred and held that the assessment was within the prescribed timeframe. The Tribunal dismissed challenges to the search&#039;s validity and emphasized determining undisclosed income based on search material. It ruled against reliance on retracted statements and invalidated a special audit report obtained without providing a hearing. The Tribunal deleted additions based on seized documents, emphasizing the need for positive evidence. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal stressing procedural compliance and fair opportunities for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 591 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order u/s 158BC, stating that the notice issuance during an ongoing search was a procedural irregularity. The Tribunal rejected the contention that the assessment order was time-barred and held that the assessment was within the prescribed timeframe. The Tribunal dismissed challenges to the search&#039;s validity and emphasized determining undisclosed income based on search material. It ruled against reliance on retracted statements and invalidated a special audit report obtained without providing a hearing. The Tribunal deleted additions based on seized documents, emphasizing the need for positive evidence. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal stressing procedural compliance and fair opportunities for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>