<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 452 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170007</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that unless the criminal charge is serious and involves complex legal issues, departmental and criminal proceedings can run concurrently. It emphasized the distinct objectives and standards of proof in each process. In this case, where the departmental charge was unrelated to the criminal offense, the Court ruled against staying the proceedings, allowing them to continue simultaneously. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 14:17:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 452 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170007</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that unless the criminal charge is serious and involves complex legal issues, departmental and criminal proceedings can run concurrently. It emphasized the distinct objectives and standards of proof in each process. In this case, where the departmental charge was unrelated to the criminal offense, the Court ruled against staying the proceedings, allowing them to continue simultaneously. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>