https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170005 Where allegations of corruption in recruitment are not shown to taint every appointment, the State must first conduct a fair, evidence-based segregation of tainted and untainted candidates before cancelling selections en masse; otherwise the action is arbitrary and unsustainable. The Court also stressed that judicial officers must be afforded a fair opportunity to meet the material against them, and that proceedings are vitiated where non-disclosure of reports and apparent bias create a legitimate apprehension that justice was not seen to be done. The impugned action was therefore set aside to the extent challenged, and the matters were remitted for fresh, independent scrutiny on proper material. en-us Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170005 Where allegations of corruption in recruitment are not shown to taint every appointment, the State must first conduct a fair, evidence-based segregation of tainted and untainted candidates before cancelling selections en masse; otherwise the action is arbitrary and unsustainable. The Court also stressed that judicial officers must be afforded a fair opportunity to meet the material against them, and that proceedings are vitiated where non-disclosure of reports and apparent bias create a legitimate apprehension that justice was not seen to be done. The impugned action was therefore set aside to the extent challenged, and the matters were remitted for fresh, independent scrutiny on proper material. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170005