<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1122 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169985</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in favor of the respondent, determining that the activity of building bus bodies constituted a sale rather than a works contract. The Court emphasized the importance of expertise, material supply, and immediate usability in distinguishing between the two. The judgment in Patnaik&#039;s case was instrumental in establishing the nature of the activity as a sale, leading to the dismissal of the appeals filed by the Income-tax Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 17:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1122 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169985</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in favor of the respondent, determining that the activity of building bus bodies constituted a sale rather than a works contract. The Court emphasized the importance of expertise, material supply, and immediate usability in distinguishing between the two. The judgment in Patnaik&#039;s case was instrumental in establishing the nature of the activity as a sale, leading to the dismissal of the appeals filed by the Income-tax Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>