<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 452 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259578</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit condition was imposed for the appeal, but the required amount was later made good before final hearing. Considering the appellant&#039;s default, the age of the person in charge, closure of the business, and the additional deposit made during hearing, the Delhi HC held that the appeal should be heard on merits. The dismissal for non-deposit of the full pre-deposit amount was not sustained, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 452 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259578</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit condition was imposed for the appeal, but the required amount was later made good before final hearing. Considering the appellant&#039;s default, the age of the person in charge, closure of the business, and the additional deposit made during hearing, the Delhi HC held that the appeal should be heard on merits. The dismissal for non-deposit of the full pre-deposit amount was not sustained, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>