https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259566 The company court's jurisdiction under the Companies Act, 1956 was held not to be displaced by the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, because the parliamentary law occupied the field and the later State tenancy law, despite Presidential assent, did not oust that authority. However, the eviction direction against persons in possession could not stand where it was made in disclaimer proceedings without notice or an opportunity to be heard. The court therefore rejected the jurisdictional objection but recalled the eviction part of the earlier order for breach of fair procedure. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2015 06:18:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259566 The company court's jurisdiction under the Companies Act, 1956 was held not to be displaced by the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, because the parliamentary law occupied the field and the later State tenancy law, despite Presidential assent, did not oust that authority. However, the eviction direction against persons in possession could not stand where it was made in disclaimer proceedings without notice or an opportunity to be heard. The court therefore rejected the jurisdictional objection but recalled the eviction part of the earlier order for breach of fair procedure. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259566