<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 430 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259556</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It found no violation of natural justice principles in considering additional evidence under Rule 46A(4) of the Income Tax Rules. The Court emphasized the appellate authority&#039;s discretion to use overriding powers to examine new documents for a fair resolution of tax disputes, supporting the assessee against the appellant revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 430 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259556</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It found no violation of natural justice principles in considering additional evidence under Rule 46A(4) of the Income Tax Rules. The Court emphasized the appellate authority&#039;s discretion to use overriding powers to examine new documents for a fair resolution of tax disputes, supporting the assessee against the appellant revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>