<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169973</link>
    <description>A Magistrate may, at the pre-cognizance stage, direct investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and require registration of an FIR without first examining the complainant on oath, because that provision operates within the police-investigation framework of Chapter XII and does not amount to taking cognizance. The investigation under Section 156(3) is the regular police investigation that may culminate in a report under Section 173, unlike Section 202(1), which applies only after cognizance and permits a limited inquiry to decide whether there is sufficient ground to proceed. The contrary view that Section 156(3) does not authorise FIR registration was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 18:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169973</link>
      <description>A Magistrate may, at the pre-cognizance stage, direct investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and require registration of an FIR without first examining the complainant on oath, because that provision operates within the police-investigation framework of Chapter XII and does not amount to taking cognizance. The investigation under Section 156(3) is the regular police investigation that may culminate in a report under Section 173, unlike Section 202(1), which applies only after cognizance and permits a limited inquiry to decide whether there is sufficient ground to proceed. The contrary view that Section 156(3) does not authorise FIR registration was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>