<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (2) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169968</link>
    <description>SC held that a murder and theft conviction could not be sustained where unexplained delay of more than 20 hours in lodging the FIR, despite nearby police access and an asserted immediate disclosure, cast serious doubt on the prosecution version. The Court also found the recovery evidence unsafe because of discrepancies over custody of the ornaments, non-examination of a material witness, and improbable circumstances surrounding the alleged conduct of the accused. On the overall evidence, the prosecution failed to establish guilt on a safe and reliable basis, and the conviction and sentence were set aside, resulting in acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 15:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (2) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169968</link>
      <description>SC held that a murder and theft conviction could not be sustained where unexplained delay of more than 20 hours in lodging the FIR, despite nearby police access and an asserted immediate disclosure, cast serious doubt on the prosecution version. The Court also found the recovery evidence unsafe because of discrepancies over custody of the ornaments, non-examination of a material witness, and improbable circumstances surrounding the alleged conduct of the accused. On the overall evidence, the prosecution failed to establish guilt on a safe and reliable basis, and the conviction and sentence were set aside, resulting in acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>