<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 37 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169960</link>
    <description>A certificate under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not invalid merely because one stated ground for grant was mistaken, if the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied; it may also be supported by alternative grounds such as a substantial question of law and the requisite value. In proceedings under section 11 of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934, the dispute is primarily between the landlord and the third-party claimant, and the ordinary civil rules on joinder do not apply rigidly. Creditors are entitled to notice and may participate where they are directly involved, but every creditor is not a necessary party to the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 12:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 37 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169960</link>
      <description>A certificate under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not invalid merely because one stated ground for grant was mistaken, if the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied; it may also be supported by alternative grounds such as a substantial question of law and the requisite value. In proceedings under section 11 of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934, the dispute is primarily between the landlord and the third-party claimant, and the ordinary civil rules on joinder do not apply rigidly. Creditors are entitled to notice and may participate where they are directly involved, but every creditor is not a necessary party to the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>