https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169958 A question of law under Article 133 is substantial only if it is important, difficult, fairly arguable, or open to reasonable doubt or difference of opinion; it is not substantial merely because it affects the parties' rights. A settled point or one already covered by authoritative precedent will not qualify. On res judicata, the earlier decree did not finally decide the validity of the assignment or otherwise conclusively bar the issue now raised, so the plea failed. On these principles, no leave could be justified on the basis of a substantial question of law, and the res judicata contention was rejected. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2015 12:20:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169958 A question of law under Article 133 is substantial only if it is important, difficult, fairly arguable, or open to reasonable doubt or difference of opinion; it is not substantial merely because it affects the parties' rights. A settled point or one already covered by authoritative precedent will not qualify. On res judicata, the earlier decree did not finally decide the validity of the assignment or otherwise conclusively bar the issue now raised, so the plea failed. On these principles, no leave could be justified on the basis of a substantial question of law, and the res judicata contention was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169958