<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169956</link>
    <description>The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was read as supplementing, not excluding, the ordinary criminal law power of investigation, and the Prevention of Corruption Act was treated as operating alongside the procedural code; an investigation by the Delhi anti-corruption branch was therefore not invalid merely because it was not exclusive to that agency. On the evidence, receipt of money attracted the statutory presumption under anti-corruption law, and the defence explanation was found unsatisfactory. Concurrent factual findings by the trial court and High Court were not disturbed, and the conviction was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 11:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169956</link>
      <description>The Delhi Special Police Establishment Act was read as supplementing, not excluding, the ordinary criminal law power of investigation, and the Prevention of Corruption Act was treated as operating alongside the procedural code; an investigation by the Delhi anti-corruption branch was therefore not invalid merely because it was not exclusive to that agency. On the evidence, receipt of money attracted the statutory presumption under anti-corruption law, and the defence explanation was found unsatisfactory. Concurrent factual findings by the trial court and High Court were not disturbed, and the conviction was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>