https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169952 An irregularity in investigation does not by itself vitiate a criminal trial; prejudice or miscarriage of justice must be shown, and none was established here because the defence largely accepted receipt of the money and relied on explanation and mitigation. The prosecution sanction was also upheld, as it covered the transactions later split into separate trials and its reference to misappropriation, embezzlement and criminal misconduct sufficiently embraced the charged offence. Conviction was maintained, but the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone in view of the tolerated office practice, the prolonged pendency, and the appellant's substantial custody. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2015 11:22:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169952 An irregularity in investigation does not by itself vitiate a criminal trial; prejudice or miscarriage of justice must be shown, and none was established here because the defence largely accepted receipt of the money and relied on explanation and mitigation. The prosecution sanction was also upheld, as it covered the transactions later split into separate trials and its reference to misappropriation, embezzlement and criminal misconduct sufficiently embraced the charged offence. Conviction was maintained, but the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone in view of the tolerated office practice, the prolonged pendency, and the appellant's substantial custody. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169952