<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ALL CARGO 153A CONFIRMED BY BOMBAY HIGH COURT ORDER DT21.4.2015</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108594</link>
    <description>An order setting aside a revisional Commissioner order does not create a new legal proposition; reassessment must consider returns for the relevant years but the scope of enquiry remains essentially tied to the search or requisition that prompted the action, and existing Division Bench precedent on that scope stands affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 11:19:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ALL CARGO 153A CONFIRMED BY BOMBAY HIGH COURT ORDER DT21.4.2015</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108594</link>
      <description>An order setting aside a revisional Commissioner order does not create a new legal proposition; reassessment must consider returns for the relevant years but the scope of enquiry remains essentially tied to the search or requisition that prompted the action, and existing Division Bench precedent on that scope stands affirmed.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 11:19:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>