<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 467 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169950</link>
    <description>A lower grading in an annual confidential report does not, by itself, amount to an adverse entry requiring communication unless the governing assessment framework so provides. The Supreme Court noted that the army officer appraisal process operated through structured stages of counselling, guidance for improvement, and only then adverse or advisory remarks where warranted. It held that the High Court erred in assuming there were no assessment parameters and in relying on precedent without a close factual match. Because the writ petition had only complained of non-communication, the entry could not be quashed on broader grounds not pleaded. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration under the applicable framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 467 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169950</link>
      <description>A lower grading in an annual confidential report does not, by itself, amount to an adverse entry requiring communication unless the governing assessment framework so provides. The Supreme Court noted that the army officer appraisal process operated through structured stages of counselling, guidance for improvement, and only then adverse or advisory remarks where warranted. It held that the High Court erred in assuming there were no assessment parameters and in relying on precedent without a close factual match. Because the writ petition had only complained of non-communication, the entry could not be quashed on broader grounds not pleaded. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration under the applicable framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>