<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169947</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found in a case involving bias and malice in disciplinary proceedings that the Managing Director&#039;s actions were wholly biased, indicating a pre-disposition to punish the respondent. Additionally, the Court held that the process violated principles of natural justice, leading to a miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the dismissal order was upheld, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 10:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169947</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found in a case involving bias and malice in disciplinary proceedings that the Managing Director&#039;s actions were wholly biased, indicating a pre-disposition to punish the respondent. Additionally, the Court held that the process violated principles of natural justice, leading to a miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the dismissal order was upheld, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>