<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 407 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259533</link>
    <description>The case involved the disallowance of Cenvat credit by the Adjudicating authority, resulting in the confirmation of demand and penalty. The main issue was the eligibility of the appellants to avail credit under C&amp;amp;F agent service or GTA Outward Transport service, particularly concerning invoices raised by C&amp;amp;F agents. The judgment concluded that the appellants were entitled to input credit on the service tax paid by the C&amp;amp;F agents, based on previous favorable decisions and the High Court&#039;s ruling on the nature of services provided by C&amp;amp;F agents and the definition of clearing and forwarding agent. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 407 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259533</link>
      <description>The case involved the disallowance of Cenvat credit by the Adjudicating authority, resulting in the confirmation of demand and penalty. The main issue was the eligibility of the appellants to avail credit under C&amp;amp;F agent service or GTA Outward Transport service, particularly concerning invoices raised by C&amp;amp;F agents. The judgment concluded that the appellants were entitled to input credit on the service tax paid by the C&amp;amp;F agents, based on previous favorable decisions and the High Court&#039;s ruling on the nature of services provided by C&amp;amp;F agents and the definition of clearing and forwarding agent. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>