<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 401 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259527</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee a pro-rata deduction under section 80IB(10) for Buildings A, B, and C, while denying the deduction for Building D, which was not completed within the stipulated time. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction under section 80IB(10) should not be denied in its entirety due to the non-completion of one part of the project.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 401 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259527</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee a pro-rata deduction under section 80IB(10) for Buildings A, B, and C, while denying the deduction for Building D, which was not completed within the stipulated time. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction under section 80IB(10) should not be denied in its entirety due to the non-completion of one part of the project.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>