<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court of Bombay Clarifies: Deposit Not Related to Duty Payments, Unjust Enrichment Rule Not Applicable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22910</link>
    <description>Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in compliance with the interim order passed by the High Court of Bombay, which was not towards duty, the question of unjust enrichment would not arise at all. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 19:21:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 19:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=384648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court of Bombay Clarifies: Deposit Not Related to Duty Payments, Unjust Enrichment Rule Not Applicable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22910</link>
      <description>Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in compliance with the interim order passed by the High Court of Bombay, which was not towards duty, the question of unjust enrichment would not arise at all. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 19:21:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>