https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169925 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the findings of malice and arbitrariness by the Tribunal and High Court. Emphasizing the importance of objective and fair assessment in confidential reports, the Court upheld the need for natural justice by allowing officers to explain adverse remarks. The pending vigilance enquiry justified the adverse remarks, negating claims of malice and arbitrariness. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169925 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the findings of malice and arbitrariness by the Tribunal and High Court. Emphasizing the importance of objective and fair assessment in confidential reports, the Court upheld the need for natural justice by allowing officers to explain adverse remarks. The pending vigilance enquiry justified the adverse remarks, negating claims of malice and arbitrariness. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169925